<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Rev2.org - Latest Comments in Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://rev2.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:14:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-7815280</link><description>Keep up the excellent work! Your website helps to keep me from boredom as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sbs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 02:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-6978867</link><description>Google has certainly created a monopoly of sorts and will remain at the top for a very long time.. it's inevitable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Otoplastia</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:57:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-6978849</link><description>Google remains the king and will be there for a lot of time...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Psicologo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:57:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-5757606</link><description>Though we cant lose hope for aspiring google killer but the fact will remain the same.. Google has captured almost all the market so its hard to take it over..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Siddiqua</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:41:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-4717598</link><description>I guess this is a case of the predator becoming a prey.  I think it difficult to kill google.  Google Killer out there:  beware and don't get killed in the process!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jastalents</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-4717589</link><description>I guess this is a case of the predator becoming a prey.  I think it difficult to kill google.  Google Killer out there:  beware and don't get killed in the process!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jastalents</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 04:03:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1081222</link><description>My wife works for Microsoft in Seattle and she says that they are genuinely scared of Google</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nappy_rash</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 14:42:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1077605</link><description>LOL - CUIL SUCKS!! The very first time I ran a search and clicked on a result, the page that popped up was full of nasty spyware. It wasn't even a "dodgy" search term. I tried it a few more times and am 100% convinced that it's not in the same league as Google... hell, even Yahoo and MSN are better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Don't Believe The Hype</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 22:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1046551</link><description>that what we used to say about yahoo or about myspace before facebook &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i think cuil should buy lots adwords from google to more traffic lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">fadi</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:35:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1041583</link><description>Google has certainly created a monopoly of sorts and will remain at the top for a very long time.. it's inevitable.  I also believe that after searching for several things on Cuil - they released it a bit too soon..the results are mostly less than desirable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:45:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1038348</link><description>That's a good point, but I think the problem -- if this should happen -- would be in judging those search results. How would you know search results for x on Google are better than the results on GoogleKiller? And if you do happen to make up your mind on the other one, how long would it take for you to completely switch your habits, or would you come crawling back a week later? I'm not completely convinced that people would let go off Google so easily.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sidyadav</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:38:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1036233</link><description>For me, it's all about the search results.  If a search engine gives me markedly better search results for every query, I'll happily use it instead of Google.  Not until then, though.  I don't care if it has cover flow results, columnar results, or holographic results; it's all a question of utility, and results equal utility.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradumbaugh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:33:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why There Won&amp;#8217;t Be a Google Killer</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2008/07/28/why-there-wont-be-a-google-killer/#comment-1027673</link><description>There is no profitable scope in search engine market. Is saturated, Google remains the king and will be there for a lot of time...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But still, in future, when more people will get online, all they want is services that respond to them in real time. Like example - Twitter. I know a lot of people who trust Twitter for their updates. A lot of people get breaking news on their mobil using Twitter. They dont rely 100 % on mechanical algorithm based search engine to give them results they want. In fast paced world, a search engine is fine, but slowly and surely, it will give way to services that provide real time access to information content. My bet is on them..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harshad Joshi</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:39:33 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>