Rev2.org - Latest Comments in http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

sex webcam amateur — Sat, 14 Jun 2008 07:29:24 -0000

submitted webcam sex chat webcam sex

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

webcam sex slave — Fri, 13 Jun 2008 23:20:26 -0000

webcam sex lesbian webcam sex sexe

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

bedroom alarm webcam — Sat, 24 May 2008 00:29:26 -0000

webcam webcams bedroom couple webcam bedroom

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

shelly — Tue, 29 May 2007 10:04:18 -0000

its great i just love to have it

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

Sid Yadav — Mon, 16 Apr 2007 01:09:03 -0000

Patrick,
That's the thing -- and that's exactly why, before we see a boom in user-generated content with this kind of live streaming (if we do), we're going to be watching only things we're familiar with -- concerts, events, conferences, etc. etc. And this kind of technology is excellent for that -- much better than the 'watch the U2 concert I taped 3 months ago on YouTube' experience.

James,
While there will be some 'bandwidth wastage,' for example if I create and stream a show for 6 hours striaght and with only 6 viewers, you have to remember Ustream.tv is paying for two different sides of the bandwidth. When footage comes in, they pay to download it -- which they will be for any possible video that ever gets streamed -- and then they pay to upload/stream it -- that is, in respect to the amount of viewers a video has. For something popular, that'll be huge. I can't imagine though, for the rest of the videos with 4 or 5 viewers they'll be paying too much. If we say in total that'll be 20kb/s (3fps, low quality?) that will result in about 72mb/hour -- still pretty managable. Of course, for the ones with 200 or 300 viewers, that'll be more like 500mb/hour (ouch!).

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

James A. — Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:46:22 -0000

Certainly this project will generate a massive amount of bandwidth consumption that will be wasted for 99% of the time... The right price to pay for a few minutes of valuable content?

By the way, did you notice this: www.yourtrumanshow.com? Know anything about them?

James
.

Re: http://www.rev2.org/2007/04/15/ustreamtv-enables-mass-live-streaming-through-webcam/

Patrick B. — Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:52:27 -0000

Streaming live video is a neat concept but who could possibly do it all the time? I don't think the idea of video for entertainment rather than always being "plugged in" will go away. I'm running a new project called Pea Bee that aggregates video from all over the web for this purpose. Check it out at http://www.peabee.com
It also supports live streams and a live streaming encoder is available from Adobe Labs. Even though the player can support direct streams, I think there's a good reason why there aren't many out there. Still, thanks for the heads up! Great blog :)