<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Rev2.org - Latest Comments in WriteMaps Launches Geni-Like Sitemaps Tool</title><link>http://rev2.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://rev2.disqus.com/thread_437/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:20:19 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: WriteMaps Launches Geni-Like Sitemaps Tool</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2007/05/04/writemaps-launches-geni-like-sitemaps-tool/#comment-8194303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WriteMaps concentrates on that "niche" group of people who are trying to build a site map because it grew out of designer Scott Jehl's initial need for an easy and standardized way to do just that, to create site maps.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You can find Scott's initial paper about it here: &lt;a href="http://scottjehl.com/localProcess/StyleMap/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://scottjehl.com/localProcess/StyleMap/"&gt;http://scottjehl.com/localP...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that attempting to turn a tool that was specifically created for a certain task into a broader user tool would actually diminish the value of it by flooding users with too many intricate controls and choices that most would not need.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andre</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 14:20:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WriteMaps Launches Geni-Like Sitemaps Tool</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2007/05/04/writemaps-launches-geni-like-sitemaps-tool/#comment-8194302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why not just use Cogmap so you can drag and drop?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 16:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WriteMaps Launches Geni-Like Sitemaps Tool</title><link>http://www.rev2.org/2007/05/04/writemaps-launches-geni-like-sitemaps-tool/#comment-8194301</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They may have made a smart move by focusing on site maps rather than mind maps.  The competition in the web-based mind mapping (and concept mapping) area is getting fierce:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://bubbl.us" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bubbl.us"&gt;http://bubbl.us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kayuda.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.kayuda.com"&gt;http://www.kayuda.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mindmeister.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mindmeister.com"&gt;http://www.mindmeister.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mindomo.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mindomo.com"&gt;http://www.mindomo.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.webofweb.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webofweb.net"&gt;http://www.webofweb.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once there was &lt;a href="http://mayomi.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="mayomi.net"&gt;mayomi.net&lt;/a&gt;, the first on-line mindmapping tool I've found - based on Flash - but that sank without trace last year.  Was it ahead of its time - before the change of thinking that made Web 2.0?  Or is it an indicator of how other on-line mind mapping sites may fare?  Mayomi's author did it as a thesis project, but if it had garnered sufficient interest and use, it would not have been left to die, I suspect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vic&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mind-mapping.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.mind-mapping.org/"&gt;http://www.mind-mapping.org/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The complete list of mind mapping and information mapping tools.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vic Gee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 23:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>